Information exchange: Stage three of the five stage model

If learners have successfully passed through stages 1 and 2, then at stage 3 they are building on these and beginning to share more information, interacting with each other, and developing strategies to engage with the course content.

On the Intro to Pos Psych distance learning module this has been happening. Students are engaging well with the discussion boards, and have been spontaneously building discussions, responding to each other. Some of these I have tried to stimulate and play a part in to encourage others to post comments. In retrospect, and now being more familiar with this model of e-learning and the thinking behind e-tivities, I could have been even more mindful of this. That is, rather than encouraging or inviting students to post thoughts to the discussion board, I could have made this a 'required' e-tivity, by having students post at least one comment for each discussion thread and commenting on at least one other's post. I might have also asked a different student each week to be a 'facilitator' for the discussion that week and have them take responsibility for beginning the discussion.

UPDATE (2 Feb 2015): I related these ideas to one of the summative assignments for the Intro to Pos Psych distance learning course. This is a poster presentation that students submit via turnitin for assessement. In the attendance version of this module, students give either an oral presentation or a poster presentation to the group as part of the final teaching weekend. They are then encouraged to look at other students' posters and to ask questions to the person whose poster it is. The idea is that this feels like a poster session that you would get at an academic conference, and it gives the students some experience of disseminating and discussing their work in this way.

To replicate this online, I asked students to post their posters on the discussion board and then to look at others' posters and to post questions for at least 2 other students. This built some good in-depth discussion between students that needed little input from me (I did make sure I asked at least one question to each student). The depth of the discussion was in some ways greater than the discussions that we sometimes see at the attendance weekends. Added to this, we have the record of the discussions automatically archived in the discussion board, which may be useful for the external examiner. Result! [I will attempt to copy this discussion across to my PGCert Bb organisation, but if this i snot possible I will aim to add the PGCert T-eL Course Team to the PS726 module shell.]

The magic of Skype!

This evening was a nice lesson in how we (or at least I) have become increasingly comfortable with
what technology allows us to do! Over this past semester I have been a visiting lecturer at Regent's University London (RUL) and whilst there today I was due to have a tutorial over Skype with a student on the distance learning Intro to Pos Psych course (the course delivered through here at Bucks) who happens to be based in Vancouver on the West Coast of Canada. As it turned out the internet connection at RUL was down so we couldn't do the tutorial.

However, as I had Skype on my phone I was at least able to IM the student via 3G. So the lack of a wifi or cabled link to the web didn't stop us and eventually as I was walking down Baker Street towards the tube, I was able to have a real-time 'tutorial' via the Skype IM facility with a student in Vancouver! I was able to give concise answers to specific questions she had regarding her assignment which allowed her to move forward. I am still utterly amazed at what communications technology now allows us to do. A great example of this supporting learning and teaching in a subtle yet helpful way. :-)

This is just the latest example in how Skype (and related communication tools) are becoming increasingly integrated as tools that allow us to support students in different ways. For example, I am increasingly holding one-to-one tutorials with students over Skype, even those who could visit the University campus relatively easily. This is because it is reliable, convenient and time-effective for both students and myself. Also, as I work in a shared office environment, it is often not practical to hold tutorials in my office space if one is not wanting to disturb others as well as feeling less constrained to talk freely. Using Skype in this way also makes it possible to have tutorials with MAPP students outside of the monthly teaching weekends (as these weekends are often very full as it is!) especially with students who live some distance away.

This year we have also attempted to support MAPP students via the use of Skype when they have been unable to attend a scheduled teaching session in person. For example, as we have students who travel internationally to attend the teaching weekends, we have allowed students on a small number of occasions to 'Skype in' so they could follow and be part of the sessions. Whilst this was appreciated by the student Skyping in (one was based in Qatar; another, on a different occasion, was based in Austria), it did create an extra challenge for the tutor and also created a small disruption for some of the students when trying to engage with the 'Skyped in' student in small-group discussion.

I am now looking back over these experiences and seeing how they relate to Salmon's (2000) model. It is hard to place them at any one stage of the model... perhaps there are elements here for stages 1 to 3 here, from online socialisation, through information exchange, to knowledge construction?

Reference
Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page.#